Jump to content

18-135 and astrophoto

Benj2000

By Benj2000
in Fuji X Lenses

 Share

Recommended Posts

Benj2000 Rookie

Benj2000

Posted
Posted

Hi everybody,

 

Last night, I see a beautiful sky and fortunately I just have my tripod and Fuji XT-1 with 18-135 zoom with me. So I decide to take my first shot at night.

 

I was slightly disappointed by a strange artefact I saw on my picture and I decide to ask the question to the expert of this forum...

 

When I put maximum clarity on my shots (and it's also noticeable without), I see a light circle on the picture much more noticeable in the thumbnail or when you are far from your screen.

 

Don't look at the image quality, it was just test shot.

 

EXIF : 18mm 15 sec f3.5 iso 3200 

 

Anybody knows why this circle appears ?

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Benj2000 Rookie

Benj2000

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

It's a RAW shot edited with LR and the I tried to deactivate lens correction and the circle remain... actually in didn't notice any change in the image by unchecking lens correction profile in LR...

maybe environment light pollution but it was pretty dark around me.

I never noticed this problem in daylight condition.

Very strange ! Did you ever tried to do astrophoto with the 18-135 ?

Edited by Benj2000
Link to post
Share on other sites
Benj2000 Rookie

Benj2000

Posted
  • Author
Posted

To test if that come from light pollution or my lens, I just took a shot of a white wall in low light condition and the same circle appeared (to better see it you have to look a thumbnail of the jpg or step back from your screen)

 

Do you think it's normal for a 18-135mm lens @18mm or is it abnormal and a problem in the lens?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites
quincy Community Regular

quincy

Posted
Posted

I searched flickr for night shots done with the 18-135, and I didn't find anything that resembles your problem.

 

As Vidalgo said, it might help to see in camera jpegs. Maybe you could put one of the RAW files back on a sd-card and put it in the camera to create two jpegs via the built in RAW converter, one with the lens modulation optimizer turned on, and one without.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Benj2000 Rookie

Benj2000

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Good idea, I've already tried to develop in the XT1 with lens modulation deactivate by with the same issue! :(

What do you think of the white wall image (aka flat frame).

There is some vignetting but I also notice the same dark circle in the center. Especially visible in small format or far from the screen. Is it normal ? The lens modulation have been deactivated....

Edited by Benj2000
Link to post
Share on other sites
quincy Community Regular

quincy

Posted
Posted

If it were a normal feature of the lens (fuji lenses, especially the cheap ones like the 18-135 or the newer 23/2, 35/2, 50/2 rely heavily on postprocessing in software), the lens modulation optimizer should correct it, at least a bit. If it does not, the lens probably has a problem. On the other hand, such high clarity levels are not normal either. Is the white wall image straight from camera? And have you tried other focal lengths?

Link to post
Share on other sites
mcdesign Apprentice

mcdesign

Posted
Posted (edited)

"Did you ever tried to do astrophoto with the 18-135 ?"

 

Not the lens to use, I have the Samyang (Rockinon) 12mm f/2 for astro photography with the XT1, which incidentally is fantastic for astro work, I tried first with my 14mm, I wasn't entirely happy with the results so bought the Samyang.  Sample attached. EXIF 25s @ f/2 ISO 4000, Manual exposure and focus, bulb setting, remote, tripod.

 

Hope this helps, I have that lens that you used and have had no issue with it for normal photography.

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by mcdesign
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...
konzy Enthusiast

konzy

Posted
Posted (edited)

I think it's simply a limitation of the lens. I'm not sure it's officially called vignetting, but that's how I call it! As far as I know, every lens has this kind of issue, more or less pronounced, with different shapes and effects.

 

Here is a picture of my wall with my 18-135mm (wide open, fastest shutter speed available). I moved the sliders to extreme values to reveal that ring:

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Now, nobody really use these extreme values in real life. I seldom use the clarity slider...

 

However, you can use the "Dehaze" slider, which does a very good job in adding more contrast and revealing the stars, without turning the photograph into a Jackson Pollock painting. In Lightroom > Develop, it's in the "Effects" menu.

Edited by konzy
Link to post
Share on other sites
Michael McKee Apprentice

Michael McKee

Posted
Posted

I think it's simply a limitation of the lens. I'm not sure it's officially called vignetting, but that's how I call it! As far as I know, every lens has this kind of issue, more or less pronounced, with different shapes and effects.

 

Here is a picture of my wall with my 18-135mm (wide open, fastest shutter speed available). I moved the sliders to extreme values to reveal that ring:

 

attachicon.gifScreen Shot 235.jpg

 

Now, nobody really use these extreme values in real life. I seldom use the clarity slider...

 

However, you can use the "Dehaze" slider, which does a very good job in adding more contrast and revealing the stars, without turning the photograph into a Jackson Pollock painting. In Lightroom > Develop, it's in the "Effects" menu.

Unfortunately, the Dehaze filter adds a lot of noise, which is already a problem with night photography.

Link to post
Share on other sites
konzy Enthusiast

konzy

Posted
Posted (edited)

I really don't think a lens hood could create white circles nor prevents them  :) I haven't use any during my test, and the camera wasn't facing any light source, just the wall. It's just a design flaw.

 

 

Unfortunately, the Dehaze filter adds a lot of noise, which is already a problem with night photography.

 

Dehaze doesn't add any noise. It might make the existing noise slightly more noticeable, due to the enhanced contrast, but so does changing the curve.

 

Here is an example of a SOOC JPEG, and the same JPEG with dehaze at some extreme value (+100):

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

The noise on the right was already there, and is barely more noticeable. Of course, one could diminish the noise on this picture by using noise reduction, or stacking frames.

Edited by konzy
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
JXPhotoGuy Apprentice

JXPhotoGuy

Posted
Posted

"Did you ever tried to do astrophoto with the 18-135 ?"

 

Not the lens to use, I have the Samyang (Rockinon) 12mm f/2 for astro photography with the XT1, which incidentally is fantastic for astro work, I tried first with my 14mm, I wasn't entirely happy with the results so bought the Samyang.  Sample attached. EXIF 25s @ f/2 ISO 4000, Manual exposure and focus, bulb setting, remote, tripod.

 

Hope this helps, I have that lens that you used and have had no issue with it for normal photography.

I use the same lens ie Rokinon 12mm f/2 for all my astrophotography work, as the FX 18-135 and using high ISO is just not the right lens for the job.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 year later...
chris66 Newbie

chris66

Posted
Posted

hi there, i have exactly the same rig as you, and strangely enough, i get that exact anomaly on my images of 15sec or more exp,  on inspection i have determined that the 18-135mm lens feels slightly loose on my x-t1... i`m going to be attempting night shots soon with a 35mm prime lens on the same body to see if the anomaly is still there

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • BobJ
      X-T5 Cleaning Mistake

      By BobJ · Posted

      Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • jerryy
      Astro-photography (open thread)

      By jerryy · Posted

      Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Greybeard
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Greybeard · Posted

    • BIGOAK
      55 or 80?

      By BIGOAK · Posted

      Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • Fotomatt
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Fotomatt · Posted

      See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...