Jump to content

What is this? Should I run like hell?


Recommended Posts

It looks like that you can take that metal element out by unscrewing 3 screws. I don’t think there is anything more complicated than that!

 

It should then be easy to clean although the pattern looks like it is almost something intentional ( i can see a smudge where you probably have tried to clean the metal retainer) but it is impossible that it would have been purposely done when new.

 

Is this a Minolta 135mm MD f2.8 or thereabouts? They are not special lenses but should be good and frankly speaking given their relatively small value there is nothing wrong in attempting to clean it, you won’t be losing much even if you were to damage the lens.

 

Other than that, this is not a type of fungus which could infect your camera and other lenses and it would be harmless, I think.

 

If the metal is, as I think, aluminum, it has to be a reaction to some agent producing aluminum oxide crystals.

 

Remove them and then apply a coat of black spray mat paint.

 

http://www.howtocleanthings.com/surfaces/how-to-clean-aluminum/

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Is this a Minolta 135mm MD f2.8 or thereabouts? They are not special lenses but should be good and frankly speaking given their relatively small value there is nothing wrong in attempting to clean it, you won’t be losing much even if you were to damage the lens.

 

 

Sorry for off topic but I need an advice.

 

Milandro, I'm pretty sure you have a big deal of experience with old Minolta lenses, so could you please suggest me what may I add to my recently purchased Minolta X-700 equipped with 50mm 1.4. I'd like to add some lens in wide and tele department. I've heard it's better to avoid MD III series and get older Rokkor ones. What can you say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for off topic but I need an advice.

 

Milandro, I'm pretty sure you have a big deal of experience with old Minolta lenses, so could you please suggest me what may I add to my recently purchased Minolta X-700 equipped with 50mm 1.4. I'd like to add some lens in wide and tele department. I've heard it's better to avoid MD III series and get older Rokkor ones. What can you say?

 

 

You might find this helpful:

 

http://artaphot.ch/minolta-sr/objektiv-vergleiche

 

This guy tested old Minolta lenses on Sony full frame bodies and against modern glass like the latest A and E mount offering.

 

It is mostly in German (use Google Translate), but often the images really speak for themselves.

 

On a side note, I like quite a bit my Minolta MC 24/2.8 (old version, not the new one with the 49mm filter size) and the 105/2.5 MD (latest version).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be someone tried to clean the back element with a caustic (glass cleaner with an additive?) and that etched the metal. You may never know how much that effected the rest of the lens without a tear down.

 

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

I have an 135mm Minolta lens that has just the same problem and it's never been cleaned with anything.

Edited by pranfeuri
Link to post
Share on other sites

The rest of the lens looks pristine, body and glasses.

e76c70247cbad291fd0bbf9d0c9af056.jpg

 

Just remove the screws, take the cover out and wash it with water and a good toothbrush. Use a good multipurpose cleaning agent, rinse clean, dry (under the sun for a good dose of uv) and replace. Chances are It won't come back again.

Edited by Aswald
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • X Raw Studio works with image files on your computer - not the image files on the camera card
    • Hello. Thankyou,now Is all more clear: I have take some time in your link. Let tell you. I has totaly forget this machine have "compress picture option" and not Only "compress lossless" anyway not change the experiment. RAW  and this last two format look like same result about Number of recording picture. Can tell all results in this: in raw you can make 17 pictures for second. Is wrong. Is about One single Press and wait buffer. Full 30/20/10/8 not change. After 17 Need Press again. You not can Press before "redgreen light recording Is on".   With preshot you can have 25  are more 7 pictures . The story change Only in jpg shot only. In jpg at 30 you have 30 picture but redgreen light off very Fast so you can shot very quicly. At 20 shot Is about start look like infinite shot. 60. So the best performance are this last One  about Speed and recording picture after camera working witout big limit. I want take a shot about Italy cyclet Just for passion. I think i Will use this last setting.  After Need check when battery not are full change and ambient temp.  Anyway my cam look like exactly specific about you link. Im Happy my cam working perfectly.
    • I do not use Flickr, so I do not know what their BB code is. All I did was copy the second link you provided, (starting at https: and ending at  _k.jpg — leave off the [img] and [/img] tags) and pasted it into the message. After a moment, a message popped up asking if I wanted to paste it as the image or as a plain link. I did this twice, the first time I had it paste in as the image and the second time as a link. Nothing fancy or tricky.
    • So do I just copy the BB code from flickr and paste it anywhere on the page like other forums or is there some other trick I need to perform to get it to post?
×
×
  • Create New...