Jump to content

Video vs still capability


MSW

Recommended Posts

The X-T2 was bulked up from the T-1 in part to accommodate the heatsink needed to accommodate 4K video.  But if the link below speaks truly, 4K is already old tech - 8K is the future.  Absent some big improvement in thermal efficiency, an X-T(next) will need an addition bulk-up.  Maybe that will come the the super/ultimate x-trans model that is rumored to be in the pipeline.  Perhaps it is time to revert to separate still and video cameras rather than the current digital Swiss Army Knives (DSAK's)?

 

Opinions.

 

 

https://petapixel.com/2017/04/17/rise-8k-pros-cons-adopt-asap/

Link to post
Share on other sites

On those rare occasions when I come across a scene worth recording on video I am totally satisfied with 1080, though my camera is capable of 4k. It's just me. Other people might be interested in new technologies while I prefer a light weight unobtrusive camera - which was exactly the reason I bought into Fuji in the first place.

 

And yes, I do have a separate Canon video camera for those occasions, when I plan some high quality prolonged recording.

 

Swiss army knife? That's a good way to describe the camera I will not be investing in any time soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8K then 16K then 32K, they will all happen

 

We just need a few more die shrinks of processors to get the technology into XT size bodies, is there any point in such high resolutions for a moving image that is debatable.

 

For the little video I do (ATM), the output at 1080p from my Xtrans2 bodies is more than good enough.

 

But, I am looking to get back into video and the Video Features that would actually interest me if Fuji adopted them would be:

 

4K photo (the ability that Panasonic cameras have to record 4K video and then pull the stills frame by frame from the camera)

No time limit on video files, 15min recording limits is annoying.

 

If Fuji released an X-V (video) Pro, with all the photo features of the XT-2 and proper video support at less than £2500, I'd definitely want one

Edited by Tikcus
Link to post
Share on other sites

Video is a free feature. It has been around since the dawning of the digital camera era. Every camera with LiveView has a video feed, and firmware and software development costs were paid off long ago. However, not every camera is ideal for video use, and most still photographers lack the necessary skills to do watchable video well. The camcorder is alive and well.

 

Yes, 4k is here and it has been here for quite a while. I did virtual sets for a cable science show back in 2010 and we were working in 4k back then. However, we had access to a 4k video editing suite along with green-screen studio and 4k video cameras—and most importantly—professional staff. I wonder what percentage of people who bought a still camera with 4k being a major deal-maker, have actually finished their second project? I expect that a lot of first projects get shuffled to the back burner unfinished. Making watchable video is skill intensive and a LOT of work.

 

Compared to 1080 HD, 4k needs four times the resources—storage in camera and on drives, RAM and CPU, video card and above all, a 4k monitor. When it arrives, 8k will double that. Of course, if you are shooting for network or theatrical release, you can hire the skills and the hardware costs are trivial compared to the overall production budget. Whether shot 4k or 8k, most enthusiast video will be viewed on standard 1920×1080 HD screens because that is what people have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the little video I do (ATM), the output at 1080p from my Xtrans2 bodies is more than good enough.

 

But, I am looking to get back into video and the Video Features that would actually interest me if Fuji adopted them would be:

 

4K photo (the ability that Panasonic cameras have to record 4K video and then pull the stills frame by frame from the camera)

No time limit on video files, 15min recording limits is annoying.

 

If Fuji released an X-V (video) Pro, with all the photo features of the XT-2 and proper video support at less than £2500, I'd definitely want one

 

A 15-minute take (unedited) would be beyond annoying, it would be close to cruel and unusual punishment. Turn on your TV to a random show. Notice that whether it is news, sports, drama, reality, talking heads, documentary, whatever… they are all made up of cuts with few going over 10 seconds. 

 

Back in the days of 8mm home movie cameras, cartoonists had a field day with people trying to squirm out of home movie nights. Now everyone has a TV and it is not unusual to have it on for many hours a day. This is the standard by which you are judged. Even the lowest budget cable time-filler is well shot with even lighting, steady camera moves, and edited from short takes.

Edited by Larry Bolch
Link to post
Share on other sites

A 15-minute take (unedited) would be beyond annoying, it would be close to cruel and unusual punishment. Turn on your TV to a random show. Notice that whether it is news, sports, drama, reality, talking heads, documentary, whatever… they are all made up of cuts with few going over 10 seconds. 

 

Back in the days of 8mm home movie cameras, cartoonists had a field day with people trying to squirm out of home movie nights. Now everyone has a TV and it is not unusual to have it on for many hours a day. This is the standard by which you are judged. Even the lowest budget cable time-filler is well shot with even lighting, steady camera moves, and edited from short takes.

 

that's fine if you can shoot on multiple cameras with a team, when i have to shoot live events on a single camera alone (normally unpaid non professional), having to constantly start and stop recordings for a show that does not have any breaks or pauses is a lot of work, yes i could invest again in a camcorder or a different camera make, but since it is unpaid, and only every now and then i'm not prepared to invest the money

Link to post
Share on other sites

The X-T2 was bulked up from the T-1 in part to accommodate the heatsink needed to accommodate 4K video.

 

My impression is that any x-series camera design is entirely focussed on stills, only adding extra video features after the hardware design has been fixed. In the case of the x-t2, the bulk was added for improved autofocus and continuous shooting, the 4k video only added because it could be done within that bulk. I suspect that's also why Fuji has a less than stellar reputation for video on their cameras.

Edited by Florian
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Does it use wi-fi when you are not specifically attempting to transfer files?
    • Hello dear Fujifolks - I come from 54 years of shooting Nikon cameras, and this is my first Fujifilm experience as I've just sold my Nikon D7200 in exchange for a tiny but endearing X-T20. Very pleased with it as it's so lightweight, but very well built. But takes some getting used to the menus and settings after Nikon's DSLR functional simplicity ! I'm working on it though and slowly coming to terms with the new system. My question for now is this: is there any way to turn OFF the wifi antenna in the camera ? I'm particularly wifi signal sensitive and have no intention of using that function as I do all my editing and printing on my PC. I've checked the wifi menu options but cannot find a simple wifi ON-OFF selector. Thanks for your help and I'll be back with more Q's when needed. Blessings to you all... 
    • Has anyone successfully used pocket wizards with an XT5? I cannot get it to fire.  Do Fujis and pocket wizards get along? Thanks in advance for your wisdom on this, kind readers!
    • Grzegorz, Go to the Networking Setting in your camera menu (the last one at the bottom - unless you have a My Menu then that is the last one). There, go to Network Setting and choose the SSID (name) of your WiFi network, type in the password, choose "SET". If you have a functioning DHCP server on your network, the camera should get its IP address (and Subnet_Mask and Gateway). If not, you can enter these manually. It is a little tricky, there will be some zeros already here, move the cursor after the zero and use DEL to delete it and make space in the input fields for your own correct values. If you do not know what to enter, have a look at values in the network settings of your computer and use the same except for the IP address, try some fairly higher number, hopefully you hit an unused one. Usually the values would be something like IP: 192.168.1.188, Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0, Gateway IP: 192.168.1.1  or something like that, take clues from your computer. The camera and computer must be on the same network. Then in Connection Mode on the camera, choose Wireless Tethering Fixed. And half-press the shutter to exit the menu and get in shooting mode. The red LED should be blinking. If you can look at your network devices, e.g. on your router, you should see the camera there. You can see check the camera settings in the camera menu in the INFORMATION item of the Network Setting menu to see the MAC address of your camera and look for it in the list of devices on your network.  Then use the tethering in your software, e.g. in Capture One. The camera may not show immediately, take a shot and then it should show in the list of available cameras. Good luck. Report back how did you fare.  PS If you have a Windows machine, you need to have Bonjour installed and running. Macs have it.
    • Hey all, I just got my first camera. The X-T30 II. It seems the Eye Sensor + LCD Image Display view-mode is doing the exact same thing as just the Eye Sensor view-mode setting. Any ideas why this is or what's supposed to be happening? Firmware Version: 2.04
×
×
  • Create New...