Jump to content

Silver Mitakon Mark II 0.95/35mm vs its "Dark Side" version


yukosteel

Recommended Posts

Decided to share few interesting observations from comparing "two color" versions of exact same lens - Mitakon Mark II 0.95/35mm.

 

There are few obvious differences displayed on dealers site pictures - newer version has silver aluminum frame, red numbers for ft, and red dot marker for aperture position.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Deeper look unveils one more difference - silver version has more yellowish and greenish tint on glass surfaces, comparing to its "Dark Side" version.

 

Same from the rear look

 

One more positive difference in this new silver sample - aperture blades don't shake inside on f0.95 value (they do in the black version).

 

Other than that both lens deliver exactly same sharpness and contrast indoor. Will be interesting to try them under different light. Will share if notice any other difference.

And to my taste silver version looks more natural on Fuji-X silver/chrome bodies : )

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Didn't notice any difference while shooting, despite the different coating both lens deliver same results.

 

However my silver sample had issue with focusing ring. I didn't notice it much until compared with silky smooth focusing on black sample.

There was about 1-2mm lag on changing focus direction, which makes precise focusing a bit slower process.

 

Chinese seller offered return and replace, but that's too much time, so decided to fix that locally.

I've disassembled helicoid and re-distributed white grease. I've also adjusted better positions of helicoid lockers.

It solved the issue, now lens is focusing very smooth without any lag.

 

Few shots, all at f0.95

ISO200, 1/1700s, +2/3EV
33357224951_17f47c4425_b.jpg

ISO800, 1/60s
33329574002_e1a79d2269_b.jpg

ISO1250, 1/60s
33329573832_f18daa90f4_b.jpg

 

 

Few daily close up shots at f2 - f2.8


33135850330_c223b619af_b.jpg


33519488585_e5cb018e91_b.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
    • What's the deal Fuji X Forum? I'm noticing there are seldom replies to any topics - except for advertisements posted as replies. Really lame. Anyone else noticing the only reply they receive to a question is an advert?  🤠 fotomatt in Colorado  
×
×
  • Create New...