Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My apologies if this has been discussed elsewhere, but I've searched around for some direction on this and couldn't find much (so I created a login and this is my first post): is there a possibility Fujifilm will support future firmware updates longer for the XE-2s than the XE-2? Would there be any benefit for one acquiring a "s" camera for the purposes of future firmware updates? Thanks for your input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that is the assumption that everyone has been operating under since the messy introduction of the X-E2S ( which didn’t seem to offer much, in the way of hardware or software, difference from the X-E2) which followed the X-E2 firmware upgrade that maybe wasn’t planned to have been carried out.

 

Yet, the fact that the entire sensor generation will be upgraded makes this exercise rather futile.

 

The X-T20 is already there and the X-E3 will follow suit so what would be the point for anyone to buy the X-E2S and what upgrade could be expected (if not in terms of Flash capability) that couldn't surpass the limitation imposed by its hardware?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I know ideally it would be great to get an xe3, but who knows when that will be. My xe2 broke and I'm looking to get something now with the money returned (I have no other system). Just wanted to know if it's worth a micro upgrade for the purpose of possible future firmware or just an even swap for another E2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, seen that the X-T10 was all the X-E2 ever became (after)  the X-T20 is all the X-E3 will probably be unless they will put the joystick on it.

 

So, to me, short of waiting, the X-T20 is probably what you need. Of course that is if you really believe that you need 24Mp, otherwise the market is all yours with any secondhand camera available and discarded by all those who can’t resist the lure of a bit more of MP, whatever they think that that will do for their pictures.

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...