Clicky

Jump to content


Photo

Iridient X-Transformer + Lightroom Settings for Great Results

Iridient X-Trans Fujifilm Raw conversion Lightroom

  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1 Isaac Hilman

Isaac Hilman

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 19 posts
  • LocationVictoria, BC, Canada

Posted 31 January 2017 - 07:30 PM

Advertisement (Gone after free registration)

I've just written up a new blog post here, outlining the settings I've worked out to get the most out of Iridient Digital's new X-Transformer conversion software. I did some rather rigorous testing over the past couple of days, to see if I can find an optimal starting point when working with Iridient + Lightroom.

I was searching everywhere for suggested settings, but it being such a new product I was unable to find any real direction. 

Please have a read, and let me know what you think! I think the results are wonderful, but would love to hear others opinions. This is just a base starting point, prior to any further processing, but it makes a freshly converted X file look perfect.

Cheers;

Isaac


  • tsims10s, pmuadib and Paddy1 like this

#2 sandrogsp

sandrogsp

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts

Posted 01 February 2017 - 04:34 AM

I got hooked immediately to Irident X-Transformer and I bought a licence right away.

 

X-Transformer does a fantastic job at demosaicing , not so fantastic at NR+sharpening, expecially at high Iso.

 

When I convert I leave every setting at default, but I disable Sharpening and Luminance Noise Reduction .

 

For NR+sharpening I rely on NeatImage ( a photoshop add-on)


  • 2thfixr likes this

#3 Isaac Hilman

Isaac Hilman

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 19 posts
  • LocationVictoria, BC, Canada

Posted 01 February 2017 - 05:32 PM

Yeah, I tried most of the NR + Sharpening settings with Iridient, but felt they didn't quite do what I wanted. Also, not being able to mask which areas to sharpen is no good. I use Iridient for the straight conversion, but all of the other aspects get worked on in other programs (Lightroom + Photoshop). Super happy that I no longer have oil-paint foliage and grass in my photos!



#4 Adam Woodhouse

Adam Woodhouse

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 349 posts
  • LocationOntario, Canada

Posted 02 February 2017 - 02:26 PM

Could someone elaborate how this new X-Transformer tool is used in your existing Lightroom/Capture One workflow?  I looked at the Iridient website but found the info/tips quite vague.

Thanks


TWO Fujifilm X-T2's
16mm/1.4 | 35mm/1.4 | 10-24mm/4 | 16-55mm/2.8 | 50-140/2.8

Rokinon 8mm/2.8

Flashes: Fujifilm EF-X500, iNissin i40 and two Yongnou 565's

Classic Lens Adapters: M42, Canon FD, Nikon and Minolta MD

 

Adam Woodhouse, Wedding Photographer
Ontario, Canada
http://www.adamwoodhouse.info
Twitter: @woodhousephoto


#5 karpedward

karpedward

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 03 February 2017 - 09:59 AM

I have installed the X-transformer as a plug-in to Lightroom. Check this guide out in order to set that up: https://www.aevansph...ghtroom-plugin/

 

After that is done you import your RAF-files to Lightroom (as usual) and then you right click on the .raf files you wish to convert and run it with X-transformer. When its done you end up with a sharper file (.tiff) that you can continue to edit in Lightroom to your liking. I even noticed it is possible to use fuji's color profiles after the conversion to .tiff is done.


  • Adam Woodhouse likes this

#6 tsims10s

tsims10s

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 08 February 2017 - 10:45 PM

I've just written up a new blog post here, outlining the settings I've worked out to get the most out of Iridient Digital's new X-Transformer conversion software. I did some rather rigorous testing over the past couple of days, to see if I can find an optimal starting point when working with Iridient + Lightroom.

I was searching everywhere for suggested settings, but it being such a new product I was unable to find any real direction. 

Please have a read, and let me know what you think! I think the results are wonderful, but would love to hear others opinions. This is just a base starting point, prior to any further processing, but it makes a freshly converted X file look perfect.

Cheers;

Isaac

This was an excellent help for me. Thank you so much for suggesting turning off the Iridient sharpening and noise reduction. I am getting consistently better processing using your method thus far.


  • Isaac Hilman likes this

#7 pmuadib

pmuadib

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 12 February 2017 - 12:22 PM

I've just written up a new blog post here, outlining the settings I've worked out to get the most out of Iridient Digital's new X-Transformer conversion software. I did some rather rigorous testing over the past couple of days, to see if I can find an optimal starting point when working with Iridient + Lightroom.

I was searching everywhere for suggested settings, but it being such a new product I was unable to find any real direction. 

Please have a read, and let me know what you think! I think the results are wonderful, but would love to hear others opinions. This is just a base starting point, prior to any further processing, but it makes a freshly converted X file look perfect.

Cheers;

Isaac

 

Thanks for this post, Isaac.

I have also run some tests with x-t10 files and it seems that we are on the same page here. I have three questions for you.

What is your experience with the Lens Correction / Chromatic Aberration setting? In my testing it did not do much. ACR (or Lightroom) does much better in this and the in-camera converter does even better obviously. So I ended up turning CA removal off. I also doubt that vignetting and Distortion correction are working as intended - the dng files apart from CA always have a slight vignetting compared to the raf even when the box is ticked in IXT, and distortion is hard to tell, I suppose the lens that I was testing with produces very little distortion anyway but basically there's no difference whether this option is turned on or off. There's another forum with slightly more information available (even the developer of IXT contributing) and I have asked this question there but no answer so far.
http://www.fujix-for...e-2#post-653958

What's the point of applying the same noise reduction settings to a iso 200 and an iso 3200 image and everything in between?

Have you experimented with the smoother demosaicing option?



#8 Torturro

Torturro

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59 posts

Posted 16 February 2017 - 09:34 PM

Irident to me - gives very dull / blunt colours. 

How can we use Fuji profiles - with this combination of tools?

Any other ideas of - lets say - how to bring Fuji Velvia look to an image processed with Irident?

 

Also - irident workflow is...eeeeerrr......yyyyghhhh..... :(



#9 methodphoto

methodphoto

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 21 posts
  • LocationLondon, UK

Posted 04 March 2017 - 10:38 AM

Any other ideas of - lets say - how to bring Fuji Velvia look to an image processed with Irident?

 

 

The converter simply converts to DNG with the Raw demosaicing. If you go into Lightroom, import the converted DNGs then you can apply the Velvia profile.


  • Torturro likes this

#10 jbfilion

jbfilion

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts

Posted 06 March 2017 - 09:59 PM

@Isaac Hilman: It looks like your link is down, but I tried your tips to use Xtransformer for the conversion only, with Sharpening + NR done in ACR, and I agree that this is the best settings so far. I don't hate to have a small amount of noise, ACR gives a result closer to film grain, while Iridient looks a digital mushy noise.

 

If you use Bridge + ACR workflow like me, it's soooooo easy to use. Simply right click on your .RAF in Bridge, and hit "Open with > Iridient X Transformer". The DNG will appear right next to the RAF when the conversion is done.



#11 MShannon

MShannon

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 18 posts

Posted 28 March 2017 - 11:09 AM

I bought and installed X-Transformer and run it as a Plugin through LR. It's unbelievably better and that's me just using it at the default settings. I may try and play about with the Sharpening and NR in X-Transformer as people previously said. I'll try turning them off as well.

 

However, straight off default settings, the difference to LR is pretty stark! Glad I bought the software, much better demosaicing :)


Edited by MShannon, 28 March 2017 - 11:10 AM.

X-T2 with VPB-XT2, XF 16-55mm f2.8, XF 50-140mm f2.8 + XF 1.4TC

http://www.mshannon.co.uk
http://www.facebook....nnonphotography


#12 kyoleung

kyoleung

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31 posts

Posted 06 April 2017 - 08:14 AM

Hello! One stupid question. I am totally new to Iridient.

 

I heard Iridient is good at demosaicing. But if the picture is a bit over-exposed or need some highlight recovery. Is these things fully recoverable from the tiff file generated by the Iridient comparing to the RAW file editing in Lightroom or Capture One?  What I mean is same degree of recoverability.



#13 RadBadTad

RadBadTad

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 152 posts
  • LocationColumbus, Ohio

Posted 06 April 2017 - 03:09 PM

Hello! One stupid question. I am totally new to Iridient.

 

I heard Iridient is good at demosaicing. But if the picture is a bit over-exposed or need some highlight recovery. Is these things fully recoverable from the tiff file generated by the Iridient comparing to the RAW file editing in Lightroom or Capture One?  What I mean is same degree of recoverability.

 

I don't have much experience with Iridient, but I can tell you with reasonable certainty that the files that it creates will have the same latitude and editability as the original RAF files. It's still outputting a raw file, so all of the information should be there. 


X100s  -  X-T1  -  XPro2  -  X-T2   |  18-55 f/2.8-4  -  23mm f/1.4  -  35mm f/2  -  Mitakon 35mm f/.95  -  50-140 f/2.8


#14 RadBadTad

RadBadTad

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 152 posts
  • LocationColumbus, Ohio

Posted 06 April 2017 - 03:18 PM

I see people mentioning that they end up with a TIFF file after passing a file through X Transformer, but from what I can see, my only option is to convert my files to DNG. It's not really an important distinction, but I'm curious about what I might be missing?


X100s  -  X-T1  -  XPro2  -  X-T2   |  18-55 f/2.8-4  -  23mm f/1.4  -  35mm f/2  -  Mitakon 35mm f/.95  -  50-140 f/2.8


#15 kyoleung

kyoleung

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31 posts

Posted 06 April 2017 - 04:37 PM

I don't have much experience with Iridient, but I can tell you with reasonable certainty that the files that it creates will have the same latitude and editability as the original RAF files. It's still outputting a raw file, so all of the information should be there. 

thanks for your sharing~~



#16 sebas1430

sebas1430

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 77 posts
  • LocationBoucherville, Quebec, Canada

Posted 06 April 2017 - 08:43 PM

I see people mentioning that they end up with a TIFF file after passing a file through X Transformer, but from what I can see, my only option is to convert my files to DNG. It's not really an important distinction, but I'm curious about what I might be missing?

 

If you open directly the X-Transformer app and convert a file, the result will be a DNG. But if you launch X-Transformer from Lightroom (configured as an external editor), the result will be a TIFF. But the result and size are the same.


  • RadBadTad likes this

X-T2 | 18-55 | 55-200 | 35 f2 | Rokinon 12 f2

Vintages lenses: Canon FDn 50 f1.4 | Canon FD 300 f4

flickr.com/photos/sgirard | sgirard.net


#17 Android Alpaca

Android Alpaca

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 24 July 2017 - 07:34 PM

Hi, I'm late to the game on trying to get my RAF (from an X-T2) look better. I've recently adjusted my LR sharpening settings to help reduce the wormy grain pattern (by reducing amount and increasing detail). I'm interested in checking out the Iridient now that I discovered I can use it more easily in my LR workflow (versus entirely switching my editor), any new tips/suggestions for July 2017? 

Thanks.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Iridient, X-Trans, Fujifilm, Raw conversion, Lightroom

 
x

Registration is free

Not registered? Really?

Discover the full potential of the Fuji X Forum... register now!
Registration is free and done in a few minutes!

As registered member you can discuss, post your questions and present your images.
And get in contact with Fuji X photographers worldwide!

We are looking forward to you!

The Fuji X Forum Team

Register Close