Jump to content

Greetings from a undecided.

Brildes

By Brildes
in Newbie / Self Introduction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Brildes Rookie

Brildes

Posted
Posted

Hello Fuji guys, I am an amateur looking for camera for any use, but above all, for photos of basketball of my children.

Until now had Nikon D4, D750 and Pro lens, and it was fantastic result in all kinds of conditions.

Back problems - and age :wacko:  - they made me proceed to Micro 4/3, in particular a OMD-EM1 with their respective pro lens.

In relaxed photography i have been very happy, but photography of action and high ISO I am very disappointed.

I am thinking to join Fuji community, but  can the X-T2 in AF-C compete with DSLR like D750 on indoor sports?.

Greetings.

Sorry for my very bad English.

Link to post
Share on other sites
milandro Grand Master

milandro

Posted
Posted

Welcome to the forum, if you run a search for X-T2 and sport you will find a lot about the topic interesting you

 

http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/index.php?s=83f3289295af81aad230ffc65e3d2b5e&app=googlecse#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=X-T2%20sport

 

Anyway, the X-T2 has, yes, improved autofocus performance compared to other previous models BUT this is only possible with the new batteries and new grip, making the camera from a very small camera a much bigger affair and certainly NOT as small as other cameras.

 

The performance in high ISO of the Fuji cameras is questioned by some

 

http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/4281-is-it-just-me-or-the-lowish-light-files-are-too-noisy/

 

and it might very well not be your thing, I can’t decide for you, again, search for “ high ISO” and you will find more 

 

http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/index.php?s=83f3289295af81aad230ffc65e3d2b5e&app=googlecse#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=High%20ISO%20X-T2

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • BobJ
      X-T5 Cleaning Mistake

      By BobJ · Posted

      Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • jerryy
      Astro-photography (open thread)

      By jerryy · Posted

      Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Greybeard
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Greybeard · Posted

    • BIGOAK
      55 or 80?

      By BIGOAK · Posted

      Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • Fotomatt
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Fotomatt · Posted

      See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...