Jump to content

XT1 Colors in Lightroom


Recommended Posts

Hi all. I am still trying to get a close match between XT1 jpeg files out of camera and raw files in lightroom. I am using the color profiles that was made available for Lightroom, but still can't get them close. Skin colours differ, and background information like skies are muted. Sharpening seems to be ok setting the detail slider to 100 like other people on the net has suggested. Any of you that found a close match? Or perhaps alternative software? Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm using AfterShotPro. Colors are off. I edit RAWs to get B&W anyway. Is it really a problem that the colors are a bit off the JPEG? If you are getting results that you want to get, isn't it the point?

 

Have you got your monitor color-calibrated using a spectophotometer of some sort or not? Are you comparing colors on prints or on monitor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I think your question as the answer: the word "match". Lightroom tries to match the camera color profiles. It's a match, done by comparing outputs. It's a little "guessy" although I think it does a nice job but not a perfect one. If you want to fully enjoy the color profiles from the camera you should either shoot in JPG or develop the raw in-camera, at least until fuji releases some (real) software the uses the same algorithms to create the color profiles. Until lightroom 4, color matching in lightroom was just awful, now it's way better but will never be perfect for closed file formats like canon's, fuji's, nikon's, etc.

 

BTW, does anyone feils like lightroom CC is way faster in rendering the fuji raws than it's previous version?

 

Ciao.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use LR 5.x and the color profiles in there for my raw processing.  I find they come "closest" to the jpeg.  Even if they are a bit off, I can either leave it or adjust it manually.  I do believe LR has made some serious gains in the X file details, sharpening, etc so that I don't use Iridient Developer, or Silkypix much anymore.  The tradeoff is a much more efficient workflow for me at least.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • X Raw Studio works with image files on your computer - not the image files on the camera card
    • Hello. Thankyou,now Is all more clear: I have take some time in your link. Let tell you. I has totaly forget this machine have "compress picture option" and not Only "compress lossless" anyway not change the experiment. RAW  and this last two format look like same result about Number of recording picture. Can tell all results in this: in raw you can make 17 pictures for second. Is wrong. Is about One single Press and wait buffer. Full 30/20/10/8 not change. After 17 Need Press again. You not can Press before "redgreen light recording Is on".   With preshot you can have 25  are more 7 pictures . The story change Only in jpg shot only. In jpg at 30 you have 30 picture but redgreen light off very Fast so you can shot very quicly. At 20 shot Is about start look like infinite shot. 60. So the best performance are this last One  about Speed and recording picture after camera working witout big limit. I want take a shot about Italy cyclet Just for passion. I think i Will use this last setting.  After Need check when battery not are full change and ambient temp.  Anyway my cam look like exactly specific about you link. Im Happy my cam working perfectly.
    • I do not use Flickr, so I do not know what their BB code is. All I did was copy the second link you provided, (starting at https: and ending at  _k.jpg — leave off the [img] and [/img] tags) and pasted it into the message. After a moment, a message popped up asking if I wanted to paste it as the image or as a plain link. I did this twice, the first time I had it paste in as the image and the second time as a link. Nothing fancy or tricky.
    • So do I just copy the BB code from flickr and paste it anywhere on the page like other forums or is there some other trick I need to perform to get it to post?
    • All software is the latest between camera and app. All settings are correct on camera. I have both lossless and uncompressed RAW files on the card in the camera. I have been up and down every reddit thread to no avail and am losing my mind… I’m doing all of the right things. It even sees my camera. It just doesn’t create the “drive” for it (see attached image screenshot).  Please Help! 

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...