Clicky

Jump to content


Photo

FUJIFILM will develop an XF 8-16mmF2.8 WR lens


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

#41 herby

herby

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts

Posted 04 January 2017 - 02:30 PM

Advertisement (Gone after free registration)

Please please please make it 8-16mm f/2.8 WR and most importantly compact. Not like as compact as 35mm f/2.0 WR because that's pretty impossible but just compact enough so we can walkaround with it.

 

Just imagine all the possibilities with a 8-16mm lens :) :)

 

The same is for me.  I tried 3 different 10-24, all were blurred at the left side. Don't want to try a 4th or 5th one.

So please give us this lens.  B)  ;)



#42 Antonius

Antonius

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 24 posts
  • LocationSouth Africa

Posted 09 January 2017 - 07:30 PM

Be carefull, the new one might be blurred to the right


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

#43 milandro

milandro

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,074 posts

Posted 10 January 2017 - 08:51 AM

I have had a great 10-24 which wasn’t blurred anywhere

 

index.php


Edited by milandro, 10 January 2017 - 09:03 AM.

the popular expression wishful thinking is an oxymoron!


#44 Hermelin

Hermelin

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 227 posts

Posted 24 January 2017 - 03:33 PM

Do you guys think it will be smaller or bigger or about the same size as the 10-24?



#45 erwiurewurwehu

erwiurewurwehu

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 154 posts

Posted 24 January 2017 - 05:19 PM

Do you guys think it will be smaller or bigger or about the same size as the 10-24?

A 2.8 lens should be huuuge :-)



#46 Adam Woodhouse

Adam Woodhouse

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 272 posts
  • LocationOntario, Canada

Posted 24 January 2017 - 06:25 PM

Do you guys think it will be smaller or bigger or about the same size as the 10-24?

 

It would definitely be bigger, just compare any F4 to F2.8 lenses that are the same focal length.

But that being said ... if they released a 2.8 version and did not put IS in the lens ... it may not be too much larger than the current which has IS. 


  • Phil likes this

Adam Woodhouse
Ontario, Canada
www.woodhousephotography.com

X-T2 and X-T1
Fuji 16mm/1.4, 35mm/1.4, 10-24mm/4, 16-55mm/2.8, 50-140/2,8, 18-135mm and Rokinon 8mm/2.8

Fuji X500 Flash, iNissin i40 and two Yongnou 565's


#47 deva

deva

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 268 posts

Posted 25 January 2017 - 06:46 PM

I so hope that this lens has IS


Edited by deva, 25 January 2017 - 06:46 PM.


#48 EddieX

EddieX

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 72 posts

Posted 27 January 2017 - 04:11 AM

I 99.9% sure this lens won't have OS.


X-T2/VPB-XT2 | X-T1 | 16 ƒ1.4 | 35 ƒ1.4 | 90 ƒ2 | 18-55 ƒ2.8-4 | XF 16-55mm ƒ2.8 | XF 50-140 ƒ2.8 | RRS |

want:  X-T2 | 56mm ƒ1.2 |


#49 Hermelin

Hermelin

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 227 posts

Posted 27 January 2017 - 09:36 AM

A 2.8 lens should be huuuge :-)

 

 

It would definitely be bigger, just compare any F4 to F2.8 lenses that are the same focal length.

But that being said ... if they released a 2.8 version and did not put IS in the lens ... it may not be too much larger than the current which has IS. 

 

Good! Then I'm still at the dilemma between chosing between just the 16 and 10-24


Edited by Hermelin, 27 January 2017 - 09:36 AM.


#50 Adam Woodhouse

Adam Woodhouse

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 272 posts
  • LocationOntario, Canada

Posted 30 January 2017 - 08:15 PM

Good! Then I'm still at the dilemma between chosing between just the 16 and 10-24

 

Get both ... I did!

 

Got the 10-24 first, then 12 months later I got the 16.

 

I use them at totally different times, so having both is ideal

I use the 10-24 when outside in adequate light or when I want (or need) hand held slow shutter as the IS is quite good.  I can shoot @ 1/4 second easily with that lens and get a nice sharp image.

 

I use the 16 when I go indoors and set the aperture to 1.4 and don't touch it.  That is where that lens shines.   :)


Edited by Adam Woodhouse, 30 January 2017 - 08:15 PM.

Adam Woodhouse
Ontario, Canada
www.woodhousephotography.com

X-T2 and X-T1
Fuji 16mm/1.4, 35mm/1.4, 10-24mm/4, 16-55mm/2.8, 50-140/2,8, 18-135mm and Rokinon 8mm/2.8

Fuji X500 Flash, iNissin i40 and two Yongnou 565's


#51 Hermelin

Hermelin

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 227 posts

Posted 31 January 2017 - 09:13 AM

Get both ... I did!

 

Got the 10-24 first, then 12 months later I got the 16.

 

I use them at totally different times, so having both is ideal

I use the 10-24 when outside in adequate light or when I want (or need) hand held slow shutter as the IS is quite good.  I can shoot @ 1/4 second easily with that lens and get a nice sharp image.

 

I use the 16 when I go indoors and set the aperture to 1.4 and don't touch it.  That is where that lens shines.   :)

Too much $ to justify both for a simple hobby photographer like me :)

I'm actually thinking of selling the 18-55 so I can purchase either 16 or 10-24 with a good conscience :)



#52 Adam Woodhouse

Adam Woodhouse

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 272 posts
  • LocationOntario, Canada

Posted 31 January 2017 - 06:52 PM

If it were me, and just for hobby, I'd get the 10-24 because I find it to be quite a versatile lens.  Excellent for ultra wide angle landscape and architecture stuff ... great IS ... and zoom to 24mm to get that coveted 35mm full frame equivalent for casual street type photography.  I use and enjoy that lens much more than the 16/1.4.  

 

The 16/1.4 only comes out (for me) when I'm doing paid gigs and I require F1.4.


  • Hermelin likes this

Adam Woodhouse
Ontario, Canada
www.woodhousephotography.com

X-T2 and X-T1
Fuji 16mm/1.4, 35mm/1.4, 10-24mm/4, 16-55mm/2.8, 50-140/2,8, 18-135mm and Rokinon 8mm/2.8

Fuji X500 Flash, iNissin i40 and two Yongnou 565's


#53 Hermelin

Hermelin

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 227 posts

Posted 10 February 2017 - 02:02 PM

If it were me, and just for hobby, I'd get the 10-24 because I find it to be quite a versatile lens.  Excellent for ultra wide angle landscape and architecture stuff ... great IS ... and zoom to 24mm to get that coveted 35mm full frame equivalent for casual street type photography.  I use and enjoy that lens much more than the 16/1.4.  

 

The 16/1.4 only comes out (for me) when I'm doing paid gigs and I require F1.4.

And now I'm also thinking about the rumored 18 f/2 MK II  :o



#54 idbugs

idbugs

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts

Posted 19 February 2017 - 01:29 PM

Wow....I kinda prefer the uncorrected version. The corrected one just makes me dizzy! :D

I have an X-T2...shooting in RAW....sorry I am not understanding since not technically knowledgable - "Adobe Camera RAW has a profile for it on an X-camera"....are you referring to Lightroom or Photoshop or in-Camera?  



#55 Larry Bolch

Larry Bolch

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 147 posts
  • LocationEdmonton, Alberta Canada

Posted Yesterday, 11:01 PM

I have an X-T2...shooting in RAW....sorry I am not understanding since not technically knowledgable - "Adobe Camera RAW has a profile for it on an X-camera"....are you referring to Lightroom or Photoshop or in-Camera?  

ACR is in both Lightroom and Photoshop.To the best of my knowledge, they function identically. They function as a RAW to bitmap converter with a rich feature set. 




 
x

Registration is free

Not registered? Really?

Discover the full potential of the Fuji X Forum... register now!
Registration is free and done in a few minutes!

As registered member you can discuss, post your questions and present your images.
And get in contact with Fuji X photographers worldwide!

We are looking forward to you!

The Fuji X Forum Team

Register Close