Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I recently moved from Micro Four Thirds to an X-Pro2 and I absolutely love the images I've been getting. But I missed having a small bodied camera that was easy to carry everywhere. I was hesitant about the X70 because of the lack of viewfinder and the 28mm equivalent focal length. Based on the great reviews I had read online, I tried the Sony RX100 IV but found it awkward to hold with image quality that was not nearly as good as I expected. So I returned it the next day. After striking out with the Sony, I decided to give the X70 a try. I've had it for a few days now, but the weather has been dreary in Philadelphia all week, and I wasn't really able to put the X70 to the test until today. After a couple hours walking around South Street, I'm really pleased with the camera and the images I'm getting from it. It's very easy to shoot one handed, quick to focus and I only missed a few shots. It's great for street photography because no one seemed to take any notice of me. And I didn't miss the viewfinder at all. Here's a few images from today.

 

26876166385_228c72875c_b.jpg

Philly Jesus

 

26782865382_3b55aeae70_b.jpgHookah

 

26603105570_a784100fd4_b.jpgCigarette

 

26876167485_89583931c0_b.jpgDoggies

 

26876165895_1edb245822_b.jpgPull Ups

 

26603106170_87ce630e79_b.jpg1941

 

26603102240_674748f33c_b.jpgDreads

Link to post
Share on other sites

So how do you like the 28mm equivalent lens on the x70 (in term of focal length)? I mean, i used to be the 35mm kinda guy and wondering a lot if 28mm is noticeably too wide for street shooting.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

So how do you like the 28mm equivalent lens on the x70 (in term of focal length)? I mean, i used to be the 35mm kinda guy and wondering a lot if 28mm is noticeably too wide for street shooting.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Hi Rizal,

 

I'm a 35mm guy too. In fact, the 23mm 1.4 is my widest lens. With the X70's 28mm equivalent, I found myself taking shots from a closer distance than I'm used too. A few of my finished images were cropped in Lightroom, but I do that with the 23mm too. If it were possible, I would prefer the X70 have a 35mm equivalent like the X100 series, but I guess that would make the camera bigger and defeat the purpose. But overall, I am happy with the X70.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...