Jump to content

Anyone using the x-pro 2 and 27mm?


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I am looking at sellingmy X100T and grabbing the X-pro2 and 27mm (primarily for its compact size) - does anyone have any experience with this combo? 

If so, how is the AF speed? if you also have the new 35mm WR how do the two compare?

 

Any advice much appreciated  

Thanks :)

Edited by lhotse
Link to post
Share on other sites

The X-Pro2 is my first Fuji camera, and I was determined to start with the 27mm, because I was hooked on the Panasonic 20mm and its unique field of view when I was still using a Pen M4/3 camera. However, after watching hundreds of images from the 27mm, I recognised the one thing that I dislike about the Pana 20mm ... a bokeh with an unpleasing kind of blur. It looks shaky, artificial and plain ugly at times. I found that phenomenon in the XF27mm too many times to my liking and decided to go for the 35mm WR. The latter is a wonderful piece of glass and does render out-of-focus image areas more beautifully, but I do miss the 40mm (35mm equiv.) field of view. I was hoping that Fuji would take the 27mm more seriously, but that won't be happening any time soon I'm afraid. In my opinion it offers the most perfect angle of view (between the wide 23mm and the narrow 35mm), and I still may buy it after all, despite the nature of its bokeh. I wonder if the shaky bokeh (d)effect is typical for lens designs used for pancakes, or is it a coincidence that both the Pana 20mm and the XF-27mm share this signature?

 

The AF with the X-Pro2 seemed to be very accurate and fast. At least there wasn't a noticeable difference with the 35mm WR. I haven't tested all possible situations of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lhotse,

 

I'm using the X-Pro 2 and the 27mm.

In my opinion the 27mm is a brilliant lens and its certainly compact/lightweight. That said I'd keep your X100T for now and wait for the X100T successor. Because if compact is what you want then the X100T successor will be smaller/lighter and just as good as the Xpro2 with the 27 mm on the front.

 

Brgds

Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • 1 year later...

Have you tried a firmware update? It should not be needed but since it will reset most everything when you run it it is worth a try (and harmless)

 

I believe there is a lens update as well that ties in with the XP2 update that improved focus.

 

It's a great little lens, the field is not 100% flat but that has not been a problem however it is sensitive to cross light and it doesn't have a hood which is a faux-pas at the price.I made a cheap felt tube that fits the barrel - it works when I remember it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have an x-pro2 with 27mm (and 18-55mm and 56mm 1.2). The autofocus is not very fast and maybe a bit too noisy (this seems to me the real problem) but the lens is wonderful for its great performance and its small size. It's the ideal lens for street photography .... I find it a very high quality lens that's just a bit weak in the backlight, but it's a "must have" with the x-pro2. The bokeh? I bought the 56mm 1.2 for the excellent bokeh, from 27mm I expect "good performance and low profile" ... Exactly what it offers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • X Raw Studio works with image files on your computer - not the image files on the camera card
    • Hello. Thankyou,now Is all more clear: I have take some time in your link. Let tell you. I has totaly forget this machine have "compress picture option" and not Only "compress lossless" anyway not change the experiment. RAW  and this last two format look like same result about Number of recording picture. Can tell all results in this: in raw you can make 17 pictures for second. Is wrong. Is about One single Press and wait buffer. Full 30/20/10/8 not change. After 17 Need Press again. You not can Press before "redgreen light recording Is on".   With preshot you can have 25  are more 7 pictures . The story change Only in jpg shot only. In jpg at 30 you have 30 picture but redgreen light off very Fast so you can shot very quicly. At 20 shot Is about start look like infinite shot. 60. So the best performance are this last One  about Speed and recording picture after camera working witout big limit. I want take a shot about Italy cyclet Just for passion. I think i Will use this last setting.  After Need check when battery not are full change and ambient temp.  Anyway my cam look like exactly specific about you link. Im Happy my cam working perfectly.
    • I do not use Flickr, so I do not know what their BB code is. All I did was copy the second link you provided, (starting at https: and ending at  _k.jpg — leave off the [img] and [/img] tags) and pasted it into the message. After a moment, a message popped up asking if I wanted to paste it as the image or as a plain link. I did this twice, the first time I had it paste in as the image and the second time as a link. Nothing fancy or tricky.
    • So do I just copy the BB code from flickr and paste it anywhere on the page like other forums or is there some other trick I need to perform to get it to post?
×
×
  • Create New...