Jump to content

RUMOR: XF 35mmF2 WR will cost less than the current XF35mmF1.4 (SRP)


Patrick FR

Recommended Posts

If that is the case there will be an interesting double or even triple knock-on effect on the market.

 

Introducing any new product makes people sell older products thus increasing the number of secondhand products on the market and lowering their secondhand price, introducing a cheaper new product will also make these even cheaper ( to be able to still be attractive and be sold) thus in the long run putting the new product under pressure.

 

Best thing to do is wait after the introduction of the new cheaper product, there will be lots of older and replaced for no goo reason 35mm on the market and the new one will be probably, after a short period, when the novelty has warn out, be discounted to keep on selling more than the secondhand older ones.

 

This is a gold mine for people studying marketing! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is hard to believe that 35/2 will be cheaper than 35/1.4, because 35/1.4 is one of the cheapest X mount lenses anyway, and because 35/2 is going to be WR and almost certainly will acquire better (newer generation) AF motor. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is hard to believe that 35/2 will be cheaper than 35/1.4, because 35/1.4 is one of the cheapest X mount lenses anyway, and because 35/2 is going to be WR and almost certainly will acquire better (newer generation) AF motor. 

 

The 50mn equivalent have always been rather cheap to produce, the Nikkor 50 F1.4 is cheaper than our XF 35mm F1.4 by around 15-20%. True is plasticky but if you follow the trend, the Nikkor 50 F1.8 is barelly half the price of the F1.4 version, so it is not so unreasonable to think that the XF 35 F2 WR would be cheaper than the F1.4 version.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...